The essence of the remarks, which are usually expressed in the reviews. Since the reviewer usually has a lot of production practice, he finds most of the shortcomings in the practical part of the project or work. Moreover, the time for reviewing is limited (no more than 2-3 days), and in a short period it is not possible to penetrate into theoretical positions.
Most often reviewers note in their comments: Negligence in the design of the work (both in the text and in visual-graphic materials). The lack of documents or certificates of readiness of the base enterprise / institution to introduce part of the presented results. Punctuation or spelling errors in the text. The absence of some logical conclusions from the reviewer’s point of view.
Unconvincing explanations of the results obtained, not accompanied by the same drawings or diagrams. More significant shortcomings are usually noted in the reviews of master’s theses, which is explained by the higher qualifications of the reviewers. The shortcomings in the review of the thesis work are an example of how sometimes there is not enough time for the performer to qualitatively design the results of his many months of work. Ways out of the situation An experienced supervisor of a thesis project or work, taking into account possible problems with the review, usually considers in advance intermediate results of work and advises the performer on the identified weak points. But this is not always the case: many students are not consulting, as a result of an error it is simply impossible to fix it due to lack of time.
The way out is simple: with the threat of such time trouble a graduate student can always turn for qualified help to our authors who have the opportunity to prepare high-quality materials on graduate design. Usually, the author is selected according to the diploma’s presentation on the topic of the upcoming thesis. Cooperation can only be fruitful if the appeal proves timely. After all, no specialist, even if of the highest qualification, will be able to prepare materials for a few days or even weeks. Formally, everything can be observed, but the lack of logic in the statements, the insufficient volume of calculations, graphic errors and omissions are the most obvious evidence of haste. Then the shortcomings in the review of the thesis, an example and a list of which was discussed above, can cause not very high marks for the defense.